Asshole of the Century

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The Day the Posse Strings Up John Galt (on the hollowing of the heartland)


There was a point at which I sympathized with the adherents of Ayn Rand. Don’t get me wrong. I didn’t really agree with them. But, as an intellectual exercise, I thought that Rand’s ideas were at least as valid as those of the university academics who summarily dismissed her. In the battle for the intellect, Rand’s views were as good as most, and better than many.

But I’ve changed my tune. At this late stage in my life, I’ve come to the conclusion that emotion matters more than intellect. That passion matters more than theory. That the value of human life can only truly be discovered when you’re getting your hands dirty. And concepts be damned, Ayn Rand and the theory of objectivism is the enemy of the American polis, that sense of community that at one point defined the heart of American life.

There was a time when the owners of American business lived their daily lives in towns and cities across our country. They built their offices and factories in these towns. They walked our streets. They went to the local symphony, supported the local library, and contributed to local charities. And there is still some of that. But too many of today’s multi-millionaires consider themselves part of an elite meritocracy. They consider themselves better than the common man. In their minds, they deserve better than the nicest house in Dayton or Sioux Falls. So they spend much if not most of their time in some exotic locale, on a ranch in the Rockies or a tropical Caribbean island, hanging out with other rich folks, all of them grasping for that next symbol which will validate their success.

It is no wonder that the executives who run corporate America have little compunction about outsourcing our jobs or leaving our public institutions high and dry. They are no longer citizens of Dayton or Sioux Falls. They now consider themselves citizens of the world. And it is Ayn Rand who first gave them permission to feel this way, to follow John Galt and reject the lesser folk in their old communities for the utopia of the new elite.     

The lines are being drawn. Either you are a member of the meritocracy, inheritors of that stilted version of human progress, always focused, doing well on tests, never crossing that line into destructive behavior that repeatedly torments so much of the general public. Or you are not. And if you are not, then you are only here to be manipulated, at least as far as the folks who run this country are concerned.

I want to be clear: Moving into your private compound in the Agoura Hills is only a step from buying your own island in the Caribbean, at which point you have become the enemy. There is a certain contingent in this country that keeps agitating to bomb Iran. I say that if you want to bomb the real threat to this nation, you might begin by bombing the Cayman Islands. 

I have no argument with Rand’s intellect; I have a problem with her stilted vision of the human soul. And we need to confront the new elite with the only thing we can offer them that they’ll understand: The sheer panic of the privileged few as they are being tracked down by the mob.

True populism can be a bitch. So when we all finally get fed up and track down John Galt, out on whatever tropical island where he and his ilk have set up shop, I hope we have the good sense to string the bastard up.

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

Blogger John P. Garry said...

Goodness

I never thought of Ayn Rand as an advocate of meritocracy per se. Actually, most of what I know about Rand is from the movie version of "The Fountainhead," which supposedly reflects her intentions.

Her distinction between the "Creators" and the "Parasites" suggests an elitism beyond the tenets of meritocracy. Rand's heroes are better than other people not because they work harder, but because they are inherently better people. They are better by nature, it seems.

What makes her characters better is their uncompromising individualism, their disdain (Rand's disdain) for groups and the imposition of group values. I see this as a bit different from your rich guy on an island.

Someone who values meritocracy (even a greedy person) might encourage and welcome other people to achieve. In Rand's world this doesn't seem to be a desired outcome. The Parasites (us) need to recognize their place and submit to the Creators.

The last scene of "The Fountainhead" stages this idea exactly. Patricia O'Neil rides an elevator to join Gary Cooper/Howard Roarke in the rarified air atop his new skyscraper. She doesn't become an architect herself, she looks up in awe at one, rising to his level at his invitation. This shot made me dizzy once, which is the point--we should be dizzy in awe at our superiors.

Jun 27, 2012, 11:14:00 PM  
Blogger hundeschlitten said...

You make some valid points, JPG. But whatever the intentions of Rand, her ideology has and is being used by the new meritocrats to justify their privilege, while at the same time helping to deracinate them of any connection to the communities from which they sprang. Alan Greenspan comes to mind as possibly the most egregious of the Randians, but the banal and superficial, albeit widespread, acceptance of her ideas have made it O.K. for many of these self-described "creators" to act in ways that there forebears would have been far too shamed to do.

Jun 27, 2012, 11:53:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home